29 верасня 2006
28 верасня 2006
Shame on Milinkevich
I can't believe what this clown is saying.
«Перемены происходят, когда на улицы выходит намного больше людей. Тогда не надо идти к резиденции… Нужно просто стоять, и власть сама убежит»
We just have to stand there, and the government will run away. Yeah, right. That's what dictatorial governments do. They voluntarily run away when they see people gather. Maybe I took it out of context? Here's the full paragraph:
«Перемены происходят, когда на улицы выходит намного больше людей. Тогда не надо идти к резиденции… Нужно просто стоять, и власть сама убежит»
Changes happen when a lot of people gop out on the street. Then we don't have to go to the residence [of president Lukashenka]. We just have to stay there, and [those in] power will run away.
"Cама" means voluntarily. What a wonderful world does this man live in!
It's a big shame that the brave Belarusians who were risking their health, their freedom, and their very lives didn't have a better leader than this guy - and no, I don't think Kozulin was better as a leader, though it's a big shame he's in prison. It is obvious Milinkevich and Co weren't planning to take power. It is obvious that he's not planning it now, and even if he were, it wouldn't matter: nobody will follow him anymore. Neither him nor other professional "oppositioners", who make a living out of pretending to fight the regime.
«Перемены происходят, когда на улицы выходит намного больше людей. Тогда не надо идти к резиденции… Нужно просто стоять, и власть сама убежит»
We just have to stand there, and the government will run away. Yeah, right. That's what dictatorial governments do. They voluntarily run away when they see people gather. Maybe I took it out of context? Here's the full paragraph:
«Перемены происходят, когда на улицы выходит намного больше людей. Тогда не надо идти к резиденции… Нужно просто стоять, и власть сама убежит»
Changes happen when a lot of people gop out on the street. Then we don't have to go to the residence [of president Lukashenka]. We just have to stay there, and [those in] power will run away.
"Cама" means voluntarily. What a wonderful world does this man live in!
It's a big shame that the brave Belarusians who were risking their health, their freedom, and their very lives didn't have a better leader than this guy - and no, I don't think Kozulin was better as a leader, though it's a big shame he's in prison. It is obvious Milinkevich and Co weren't planning to take power. It is obvious that he's not planning it now, and even if he were, it wouldn't matter: nobody will follow him anymore. Neither him nor other professional "oppositioners", who make a living out of pretending to fight the regime.
Islam: Apostacy is the best option
Dean is angry at some right-wing conservatives who don't make the distinction between Islamists and Moslems in general. In case my comment doesn't appear, I pasted it here, so it's not lost.
Dean,
My Grandfather was a Communist. Born and bred Communist, who had believed in Communism, and in the goodness of Lenin and Stalin. He was also a great human being, who fought bravely against the Nazis - so he too was a US ally in WWII, then he raised children, worked hard, and set an example for all in the family with his honesty and integrity. I loved him, and I would never want to disrespect his memory. He was anything but an evil person, and there were millions like him in the USSR.
But I am anti-Communist. I consider Communism an evil ideology.
Just because there are decent, good people among Moslems, doesn't mean Islam doesn't have a problem. Calling Islam evil is not the same as calling all Muslims evil. I can respect a Moslem, just like I respected my Grandfather, but I will go only so far in respecting his convictions.
According to Dean, accepting the statement "that Islam is incompatible with democracy... means we have to declare war on the entire Muslim world if we're to hope for human freedom to survive."
I disagree with that. Declaring war on the whole Islamic world does not follow from that statement. Saying that Communism is incompatible with democracy, or is evil, didn't mean going to an all-out world with the Soviets, did it? Defeating the Nazi Germany didn't mean killing all those who had fought on the Nazis' side, did it? I think Dean can do a better job distinguishing ideas from people. Throwing around such words as "enemy" and "traitor" is a sign of a Western urbanite who probably hasn't seen much action triggered by these words.
We should not declare war on the Moslem world, but we should advocate apostacy. We should openly say to Moslems: look, we understand that this is the religion of your ansestors, and we'd like to respect that, but this Islam thing that you've got really doesn't work for us. We can tolerate your mosques, but don't expect us to like them. We have not seen much good coming out of them. It would be best if you stopped this nonsense altogether, but in the meanwhile we would appreciate if you started considering giving us the same kind of respect you demand from us. Perhaps then you'll have to admit that what you demand is not respect, but submission.
Dean,
My Grandfather was a Communist. Born and bred Communist, who had believed in Communism, and in the goodness of Lenin and Stalin. He was also a great human being, who fought bravely against the Nazis - so he too was a US ally in WWII, then he raised children, worked hard, and set an example for all in the family with his honesty and integrity. I loved him, and I would never want to disrespect his memory. He was anything but an evil person, and there were millions like him in the USSR.
But I am anti-Communist. I consider Communism an evil ideology.
Just because there are decent, good people among Moslems, doesn't mean Islam doesn't have a problem. Calling Islam evil is not the same as calling all Muslims evil. I can respect a Moslem, just like I respected my Grandfather, but I will go only so far in respecting his convictions.
According to Dean, accepting the statement "that Islam is incompatible with democracy... means we have to declare war on the entire Muslim world if we're to hope for human freedom to survive."
I disagree with that. Declaring war on the whole Islamic world does not follow from that statement. Saying that Communism is incompatible with democracy, or is evil, didn't mean going to an all-out world with the Soviets, did it? Defeating the Nazi Germany didn't mean killing all those who had fought on the Nazis' side, did it? I think Dean can do a better job distinguishing ideas from people. Throwing around such words as "enemy" and "traitor" is a sign of a Western urbanite who probably hasn't seen much action triggered by these words.
We should not declare war on the Moslem world, but we should advocate apostacy. We should openly say to Moslems: look, we understand that this is the religion of your ansestors, and we'd like to respect that, but this Islam thing that you've got really doesn't work for us. We can tolerate your mosques, but don't expect us to like them. We have not seen much good coming out of them. It would be best if you stopped this nonsense altogether, but in the meanwhile we would appreciate if you started considering giving us the same kind of respect you demand from us. Perhaps then you'll have to admit that what you demand is not respect, but submission.
Dasha Kostenko's diaries published in Moscow
Sep. 27, Moscow - presentation of a new book called "Partisan Republic". It contains eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the protests of March 19-25, 2006, afainst election fraud in Belarus. Among the book's authors, talking to the journalists was Dasha Kostenko, famous for her "March Diaries" that she was publishing on the Interenet during protests.
She said, "I wanted to do something to make at least some people understand, that this is a development. Non-violent mass protest is always a development, and not just when it leads to something that people call a 'revolution', when it leads to change of government, to the triumph of new elites"
vis Salidarnasc.
What can I say? I'm very glad for Dasha, and for those who now have an opportunity to buy the book. In light of the recent protests in Poland, that make tent camp protests seem like entertainment for otherwise bored young people, it's important to remember how brave these young Belarusians were. They knew they would almost certainly get arrested and/or beaten - unlike their Polish counterparts. And, also unlike their Polish counterparts, they live in a country where voting doesn't matter. You're unhappy with your government? Don't vote for them next time around. That's what civilized people do. And when you don't appreciate living in a civilized country, you may lose that privilege. RDH just wrote brilliantly about it.
I've read people suggest that the recent protests in Hungary and Poland were instigated by pro-German-and-French forces that try to weaken pro-American governments in Estaern Europe. I don't know about German-French, but I'm sure there are plenty of anti-American Chomsky followers in Warsaw and Budapest. And I'm sure many of them are bored.
She said, "I wanted to do something to make at least some people understand, that this is a development. Non-violent mass protest is always a development, and not just when it leads to something that people call a 'revolution', when it leads to change of government, to the triumph of new elites"
vis Salidarnasc.
What can I say? I'm very glad for Dasha, and for those who now have an opportunity to buy the book. In light of the recent protests in Poland, that make tent camp protests seem like entertainment for otherwise bored young people, it's important to remember how brave these young Belarusians were. They knew they would almost certainly get arrested and/or beaten - unlike their Polish counterparts. And, also unlike their Polish counterparts, they live in a country where voting doesn't matter. You're unhappy with your government? Don't vote for them next time around. That's what civilized people do. And when you don't appreciate living in a civilized country, you may lose that privilege. RDH just wrote brilliantly about it.
I've read people suggest that the recent protests in Hungary and Poland were instigated by pro-German-and-French forces that try to weaken pro-American governments in Estaern Europe. I don't know about German-French, but I'm sure there are plenty of anti-American Chomsky followers in Warsaw and Budapest. And I'm sure many of them are bored.
25 верасня 2006
Blogroll update
Pretty numbers - a very personal blog by a very beautiful, talented and mysterious mathematical girl. Caution: hot!
Weenie Enema - I met her at the recent blog party that Karol threw. She is very funny, witty, and simply fun. She was there with two other hot chicks, and they promised to interview me. Teasing a poor guy!
Yaron Makaron Koren - genius! He recently created two cool websites: New York Nabes - a new concept guide to renting in New York, and Discourse DB - a wikipedia of political opinion. He also has a blog! SO you better watch out.
Weenie Enema - I met her at the recent blog party that Karol threw. She is very funny, witty, and simply fun. She was there with two other hot chicks, and they promised to interview me. Teasing a poor guy!
Yaron Makaron Koren - genius! He recently created two cool websites: New York Nabes - a new concept guide to renting in New York, and Discourse DB - a wikipedia of political opinion. He also has a blog! SO you better watch out.
She is 14
Anastasia Nikiforova won the internation child beauty peagent "Mini Miss Universe 2006"
Via lipkovich
Is there an appropriate way to comment on this picture?
23 верасня 2006
Say No to misanthropy, or "It's not our fault!"
Other prosimians, such as galagos and mouse lemurs, also hunt for insects, but they supplement their diet with different kinds of food, including lizards, bird eggs, fruit, and plant sap. This opportunistic approach to feeding is seen in the majority of monkeys and also in chimpanzees. Several species of monkeys, and chimpanzees, but not the other apes, have been known to attack and eat other monkeys. Baboons, the most adept hunters on the ground, often eat meat and sometimes manage to kill small antelope.
Primate
Primate
22 верасня 2006
19 верасня 2006
Everybody's sick
I'm sick with a cold, took a day off today, tomorrow probably will, too. One friend is going through a low depression period. And another friend got bit in the face by a dog; she had a surgery, but her face got infected, and she will be in the hospital for 4 days.
Today, I read about an adoption community in Russia, which has a huge number of orphans. It's great to know that there are Russian families who want to raise children, and I hope there will be more of them. Just look at them. Can you imagine what these faces would look like if the kids were never adopted? Scary.
I also read why Pokemon violates Muslim sensibilities and should be forbidden. The reasons include Darwin's theory, gambling, triangular shapes - symbolizing Jews and masons, and depiction of creatures that don't exist in the real world, which contaminates the pure minds of children. Allahu aqbar.
Today, I read about an adoption community in Russia, which has a huge number of orphans. It's great to know that there are Russian families who want to raise children, and I hope there will be more of them. Just look at them. Can you imagine what these faces would look like if the kids were never adopted? Scary.
I also read why Pokemon violates Muslim sensibilities and should be forbidden. The reasons include Darwin's theory, gambling, triangular shapes - symbolizing Jews and masons, and depiction of creatures that don't exist in the real world, which contaminates the pure minds of children. Allahu aqbar.
18 верасня 2006
Yet another feminist Jessica
Left a comment. Thanks for commenting, Jessica. I'll just post my reply to her comment, because it sums up mu thoughts on the whole thing.
Jessica,
Do you understand that when people are photographed with the most famous womanizer in America, their feminism can't be taken seriously? That she and others on that photograph look like a bunch of horny groupies around a celebrity?
I don't care about Jessica's breasts. I would rather she got over herself and felt better. I would rather she saw nothing wrong with wanting to be sexually attractive, and nothing wrong with showing off her boobs. I consider such behavior perfectly normal. Denial of it is what's abnormal, and that's why Jessica ended up looking so stupid, not because of anything I or Ann Althouse said.
I consider feminism a joke - and a sad joke at that, because it produces sad, belligerent, unhappy women. If feminism is about respect for women, then having a "movement" of angry, opinionated bitches who insult everybody they disagree with, is a really bad idea. Coming from a place where women have to endure more humiliation than most American "feminists" can imagine, I can't have respect for a movement of spoiled brats who can't get over their daddy issues, and take it out on men, on conservatives, on whomever they can safely scream at - while doing nothing to help women who really get victimized - women in Muslim countries, in Africa, in Russia. As much as I respect the women who started the feminist movement, I despise the modern "feminism". I don't hate anyone for being a feminist, but Jessica's example shows what this absurd "movement" really leads to - women making idiots of themselves.
Jessica,
Do you understand that when people are photographed with the most famous womanizer in America, their feminism can't be taken seriously? That she and others on that photograph look like a bunch of horny groupies around a celebrity?
I don't care about Jessica's breasts. I would rather she got over herself and felt better. I would rather she saw nothing wrong with wanting to be sexually attractive, and nothing wrong with showing off her boobs. I consider such behavior perfectly normal. Denial of it is what's abnormal, and that's why Jessica ended up looking so stupid, not because of anything I or Ann Althouse said.
I consider feminism a joke - and a sad joke at that, because it produces sad, belligerent, unhappy women. If feminism is about respect for women, then having a "movement" of angry, opinionated bitches who insult everybody they disagree with, is a really bad idea. Coming from a place where women have to endure more humiliation than most American "feminists" can imagine, I can't have respect for a movement of spoiled brats who can't get over their daddy issues, and take it out on men, on conservatives, on whomever they can safely scream at - while doing nothing to help women who really get victimized - women in Muslim countries, in Africa, in Russia. As much as I respect the women who started the feminist movement, I despise the modern "feminism". I don't hate anyone for being a feminist, but Jessica's example shows what this absurd "movement" really leads to - women making idiots of themselves.
Feminism and boobs: commenting on Dawn Eden's blog
Dawn's post here. Comments here. Dawn is being nice to Jessica - perhaps too nice. I wish I could be nice all the time. Anyway, here we go again.
Commenter Jody:
Ivan,
I think you are possibly half correct - in that much of the ridicule hurled at Jessica started because she refused to self-mockingly admit her pose with the former president could be construed as a sexy strut.
But some of us who strongly objected to Ann Althouse's comments felt this was pretty low. It's an old trick to get nasty if a woman refuses to chuckle over your comments about the way she looks. I am absolutely with Jessica, Dawn and others here.
It also drove me crazy that Ann Althouse kept praising the stunning originality of one commenter who had come up with the pun "tempest in a C-cup" to describe the blog row.
Original? That's one of the tiredest cliches of the British rag tabloids whenever there is a "kerfuffle" about "breasts"!
Commenter Jill
"I think Jessica deserves to taste a bit of her own medicine: look at her blog, and you'll find nothing but personal attacks on those who don't toe the "feminist" party line."
Does she criticize their physical appearance? No. She goes after their politics, which is fair game.
The issue is that Ann Althouse criticized Jessica for having breasts, and for standing the exact same way as everyone else in the photo. Instead of dealing with Jessica's politics, Ann took on her chest. That's dispicable.
Lenin speaketh:
Jody,
"possibly half correct" -
thanks for giving me this much :) I'm gonna use it for my blog's subtitle.
I agree that Althouse went tabloid, and I wish she didn't take herslef so seriously. I'm not trying to defend Althouse, though I'm grateful to her for starting this - I'm saying that Jessica made herself fair game for tabloid-style ridicule.
Jill,
You don't seem to see the difference between "criticizing their physical appearance" and mentioning their breasts while criticizing their behavior. If you criticezed me for sexually harassing my secretary, and said, for the sake of mocking me, that I had a small penis, what would be the reason for your criticism: the size of my penis, or my actions? Wouldn't you say I was asking for indecent jokes?
In any case, Althouse got called ugly by Jessica's defenders a lot more than vice versa, and when it comes to insults, I don's see how calling somebody an a-hole is better than calling them ugly.
Jessica is ridiculous because, after posing, all smiles and excitement, with a famous womanizer, she came out as an angry feminist. That's how the boob jokes started. In other words, she got attacked because everybody saw that her "feminism" was complete BS.
If Althouse said that Jessica looks like Monica because she is a chubby brunette, you'd have a point. But the comparison was not based on looks. It was based on the male celebrity known for his "consumption of women".
Bottom line: you don't come forward with feminist rants after getting photographed with Bill Clinton.
Commenter Jody:
Ivan,
I think you are possibly half correct - in that much of the ridicule hurled at Jessica started because she refused to self-mockingly admit her pose with the former president could be construed as a sexy strut.
But some of us who strongly objected to Ann Althouse's comments felt this was pretty low. It's an old trick to get nasty if a woman refuses to chuckle over your comments about the way she looks. I am absolutely with Jessica, Dawn and others here.
It also drove me crazy that Ann Althouse kept praising the stunning originality of one commenter who had come up with the pun "tempest in a C-cup" to describe the blog row.
Original? That's one of the tiredest cliches of the British rag tabloids whenever there is a "kerfuffle" about "breasts"!
Commenter Jill
"I think Jessica deserves to taste a bit of her own medicine: look at her blog, and you'll find nothing but personal attacks on those who don't toe the "feminist" party line."
Does she criticize their physical appearance? No. She goes after their politics, which is fair game.
The issue is that Ann Althouse criticized Jessica for having breasts, and for standing the exact same way as everyone else in the photo. Instead of dealing with Jessica's politics, Ann took on her chest. That's dispicable.
Lenin speaketh:
Jody,
"possibly half correct" -
thanks for giving me this much :) I'm gonna use it for my blog's subtitle.
I agree that Althouse went tabloid, and I wish she didn't take herslef so seriously. I'm not trying to defend Althouse, though I'm grateful to her for starting this - I'm saying that Jessica made herself fair game for tabloid-style ridicule.
Jill,
You don't seem to see the difference between "criticizing their physical appearance" and mentioning their breasts while criticizing their behavior. If you criticezed me for sexually harassing my secretary, and said, for the sake of mocking me, that I had a small penis, what would be the reason for your criticism: the size of my penis, or my actions? Wouldn't you say I was asking for indecent jokes?
In any case, Althouse got called ugly by Jessica's defenders a lot more than vice versa, and when it comes to insults, I don's see how calling somebody an a-hole is better than calling them ugly.
Jessica is ridiculous because, after posing, all smiles and excitement, with a famous womanizer, she came out as an angry feminist. That's how the boob jokes started. In other words, she got attacked because everybody saw that her "feminism" was complete BS.
If Althouse said that Jessica looks like Monica because she is a chubby brunette, you'd have a point. But the comparison was not based on looks. It was based on the male celebrity known for his "consumption of women".
Bottom line: you don't come forward with feminist rants after getting photographed with Bill Clinton.
16 верасня 2006
Lenin to Jessica the feminist
Did you or did you not stick those boobs into the camera?
Do you or do you not want to be sexually attractive?
Do you or do you not want to be sexually attractive?
Typical feminist behavior
Ann Althouse says that she doesn't find Jessica interesting. Lenin comments:
Jessica might not be interesting, but talking about her boobs is interesting.
The boobs is exactly what Jessica wants everyone to talk about, and while her boobs are not particularly interesting, it is interesting that Jessica denies wanting everyone to talk about them, screaming "No! I want everybody to talk about how smart I am!" - which is not very smart, but kinda interesting.
The boobs is exactly what Jessica wants everyone to talk about, and while her boobs are not particularly interesting, it is interesting that Jessica denies wanting everyone to talk about them, screaming "No! I want everybody to talk about how smart I am!" - which is not very smart, but kinda interesting.
The typical pussywhipped kiss-ass response, of course is: "No, no, it's not because of your boobs that we like you! It's because you're so smart! You're a princess, and anyone who says otherwise is an ASSHOLE!" God bless Ann Althouse for starting this.
Feminism is a great way to talk about sex while pretending it's not funny. "The real question is: Is it possible to laugh while fucking?" - Frank Zappa
Jessica might not be interesting, but talking about her boobs is interesting.
The boobs is exactly what Jessica wants everyone to talk about, and while her boobs are not particularly interesting, it is interesting that Jessica denies wanting everyone to talk about them, screaming "No! I want everybody to talk about how smart I am!" - which is not very smart, but kinda interesting.
The boobs is exactly what Jessica wants everyone to talk about, and while her boobs are not particularly interesting, it is interesting that Jessica denies wanting everyone to talk about them, screaming "No! I want everybody to talk about how smart I am!" - which is not very smart, but kinda interesting.
The typical pussywhipped kiss-ass response, of course is: "No, no, it's not because of your boobs that we like you! It's because you're so smart! You're a princess, and anyone who says otherwise is an ASSHOLE!" God bless Ann Althouse for starting this.
Feminism is a great way to talk about sex while pretending it's not funny. "The real question is: Is it possible to laugh while fucking?" - Frank Zappa
Deep Thoughts on Feminism
I just realized that feminism is the best blog topic, because it contains the most comedic fodder, in other words - stupidity. The whole idea that one should be a feminist these days in America, is almost like campaigning for the rights of opressed Muslim men in Iran or Saudi Arabia - the difference being that feminists in America are not allowed to do things to us that Muslim men do to women in Asia and Africa. If they were, I'm afraid some of them would be happy to do that - humiliate, mutilate...After all, that's what they do to themselves.
This so-called "feminism" humiliates and mutilates a woman, because it says it's wrong to be a sex object. What man doesn't want to be a sex object? What woman doesn't want to be attractive? And this idocy that feminists try to force themselves to believe, makes them come up with all kinds of bullshit theory and long meaningless words. It makes them grow armpit hair and be mean to men. It makes them surround themselves with men without balls, and pussywhip those who have them - or at least used to have them. It makes these women lonely, unhappy, and fat.
Gosh, I could go on and on. This is a goldmine. In my next post, I should write how men want to be pussywhipped. Oh, we want it badly. Rob Shapiro is a genius. I'll tell you later.
This so-called "feminism" humiliates and mutilates a woman, because it says it's wrong to be a sex object. What man doesn't want to be a sex object? What woman doesn't want to be attractive? And this idocy that feminists try to force themselves to believe, makes them come up with all kinds of bullshit theory and long meaningless words. It makes them grow armpit hair and be mean to men. It makes them surround themselves with men without balls, and pussywhip those who have them - or at least used to have them. It makes these women lonely, unhappy, and fat.
Gosh, I could go on and on. This is a goldmine. In my next post, I should write how men want to be pussywhipped. Oh, we want it badly. Rob Shapiro is a genius. I'll tell you later.
Feminist Conversation with Jessica
No, not the beautiful Jessica who plays guitar in our band. I'm talking about the not-so-beautiful Jessica of the blog called "feministing". There's a whole scandal going on, courtesy of Ann Althouse. So, there is this photograph with a bunch of horny cows surrounding Bill Clinton (just because some of them are male, doesn't mean they are not cows), one of them sticking her boobs into the camera's lense. When Althouse mentioned that, the girl came forward and went bananas. I pitched in, and hilarity ensued. Read the other comments for some hysterical ass-kissing, as well as the usual feminist idiotisms about "patriarchal line" and "perceived intentions". I've known some smart, good-looking feminists, but for the most part, feminism seems to be an excuse for a (usually) dumb, ugly female to be a bitch yet think she's a princess.
From Jessica's post:
What's worse is that this comes from other women, other progressives, and other supposed feminists. How are we supposed to move forward as a movement if we're busy bashing each other with this ridiculousness?
Lenin:
How are you supposed to "move forward as a movement" if you do exactly what you condemn - i.e., advertise yourself as a sexual object? Got hypocricy, baby?
Jessica:
How exactly am I advtertising myself as a sexual object?
Lenin:
Gosh, what a difficult question. Let me guess...
By using your boobs to attract attention?
Jessica:
You mean, by HAVING boobs? What would you like me to do, asshole? Bind them down so you're not distracted?
Lenin:
Jessica, your boobs are not that distracting. What's distracting, apart from your "asshole" thing, is your cluelessness. You rub your boobs in your readers' faces, which would be fine if you didn't deny it. You're a clown and you don't even know it.
From Jessica's post:
What's worse is that this comes from other women, other progressives, and other supposed feminists. How are we supposed to move forward as a movement if we're busy bashing each other with this ridiculousness?
Lenin:
How are you supposed to "move forward as a movement" if you do exactly what you condemn - i.e., advertise yourself as a sexual object? Got hypocricy, baby?
Jessica:
How exactly am I advtertising myself as a sexual object?
Lenin:
Gosh, what a difficult question. Let me guess...
By using your boobs to attract attention?
Jessica:
You mean, by HAVING boobs? What would you like me to do, asshole? Bind them down so you're not distracted?
Lenin:
Jessica, your boobs are not that distracting. What's distracting, apart from your "asshole" thing, is your cluelessness. You rub your boobs in your readers' faces, which would be fine if you didn't deny it. You're a clown and you don't even know it.
15 верасня 2006
Stop calling us murderers!
...or else we'll kill you.
Pakistan’s parliament unanimously adopted a resolution condemning the pope for making what it called “derogatory” comments about Islam, and seeking an apology from him. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry also called the pope’s remarks “regrettable.”
“Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.
via LGF
Brilliant strategy.
Pakistan’s parliament unanimously adopted a resolution condemning the pope for making what it called “derogatory” comments about Islam, and seeking an apology from him. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry also called the pope’s remarks “regrettable.”
“Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.
via LGF
Brilliant strategy.
13 верасня 2006
Are we all doomed? (Completion)
On my birthday, the first thing that happened was my Grandma called all the way from Eastern Belarus. Guess whose Grandma is the coolest babushka in the world? Kind, sweet, wise, funny, honest, hard-working, - not enough words in the dictionary - she has always been particularly nice to me. She probably did spoil me a little when I used to visit her and Grandpa while he was alive, which I did every summer, But I don't care, because having such a babushka is worth a lot. Then my Dad called - hey Dad! He reads my blog sometimes. That my Dad is coolest in the world I think is pretty much obvious by looking at me. Then my friends from San Francisco called. Then I treated myself to nice food and vacuuming my apartment. Then I took a nap. Then I went to my birthday party.
And as I celebrated, surrounded by really good people, my beloved friends and comrades, some of my fears came into a different prospective. Thinking about politics and war makes you think about death - whether your own death in a terrorist attack, or deaths of innocents abroad. It is said that a samurai must think about death every day (or maybe even every second, I don't remember). I am not a samurai and I want to live a happy life. And the truth is that you are more likely to die in a car crash than in a subway terrorist attack, even if you spend two hours a day on a subway, and hardly an hour a week in a car. The thought of a dirty bomb or some WMD is a bit scarier, and chances of it happening are very uncertain. Uncertainty is a pretty scary thing - especially when it comes to scary events.
War creates a grim background noise in your psyche, and the more intense the war, the louder the noise. How much you want to handle is up to you: you can enlist and go to Iraq, or you can move to Montana. You can be a right-wing armchair general or a lefty self-righteous freak. You can ignore it all together, which is what most Americans seem to be doing.
But as I celebrated my birthday, I celebrated being alive. Every second of it. Despite the anti-depressants, the fears, and overeating for two days before my birthday and mixing beer with vodka at the party - ouch. I've been able to enjoy it so thoroughly because I had done certain things right - I had asked the right questions, I was determined enough to get the answers, I met the right people, and had enough desire to use what I'd learn as tools to become happier and stronger. I gots skills, motherpapa. I just really wanted to get happier, because I realized how miserable my life would soon become otherwise. Compared to my birthdays a year or two ago, I felt that I had made some progress - a feeling I had almost forgotten. Not a huge amount of progress, but tangible. Thanks to everybody who helped me keep my hopes up, and also thank everybody who attended the great party (and the evil ones who didn't make it) - I love you! And you better throw your birthday parties, too, so I can attend and bite your noses.
And as I celebrated, surrounded by really good people, my beloved friends and comrades, some of my fears came into a different prospective. Thinking about politics and war makes you think about death - whether your own death in a terrorist attack, or deaths of innocents abroad. It is said that a samurai must think about death every day (or maybe even every second, I don't remember). I am not a samurai and I want to live a happy life. And the truth is that you are more likely to die in a car crash than in a subway terrorist attack, even if you spend two hours a day on a subway, and hardly an hour a week in a car. The thought of a dirty bomb or some WMD is a bit scarier, and chances of it happening are very uncertain. Uncertainty is a pretty scary thing - especially when it comes to scary events.
War creates a grim background noise in your psyche, and the more intense the war, the louder the noise. How much you want to handle is up to you: you can enlist and go to Iraq, or you can move to Montana. You can be a right-wing armchair general or a lefty self-righteous freak. You can ignore it all together, which is what most Americans seem to be doing.
But as I celebrated my birthday, I celebrated being alive. Every second of it. Despite the anti-depressants, the fears, and overeating for two days before my birthday and mixing beer with vodka at the party - ouch. I've been able to enjoy it so thoroughly because I had done certain things right - I had asked the right questions, I was determined enough to get the answers, I met the right people, and had enough desire to use what I'd learn as tools to become happier and stronger. I gots skills, motherpapa. I just really wanted to get happier, because I realized how miserable my life would soon become otherwise. Compared to my birthdays a year or two ago, I felt that I had made some progress - a feeling I had almost forgotten. Not a huge amount of progress, but tangible. Thanks to everybody who helped me keep my hopes up, and also thank everybody who attended the great party (and the evil ones who didn't make it) - I love you! And you better throw your birthday parties, too, so I can attend and bite your noses.
12 верасня 2006
Are we all doomed?
Glenn Reynolds has sparked an interesting debate. James Joyner says
It is simply inconceivable that the Islamists will defeat us militarily, let alone impose their culture on us.
My comment:
Militarily - yes, but imposing their culture on us - goodness, they've already done it. Danish cartoons is just the beginning, along with European politicians hugging Hamas, along with Khatami being a guest of honor at Harvard and National Cathedral.
Those who help them destroy our culture have been doing it since the 60s in our universities and media. If (or when, rather) we have more 9/11-type attacks, who will want to live in New York, LA and Chicago? And what then will happen to our economic might?
...
I understand Glenn being tired of all the bloggers saying we're doomed. I'm tired of that, too. I'm also tired of being afraid that the subway car I'm riding in will blow up. The most natural reaction is to go back to business as usual, as James Lileks put it:
The good news? We returned to our norm: cheerful industrious self-directed Americans who think in terms of fiscal quarters, not ancient grievances, and trust in Coke and Mickey to spread our message of tolerance and prosperity. The bad news? Same as the good. Or perhaps it’s the other way around.
To make yourself feel better, you sometimes have to stop thinking about this threat, and politics in general. But in my opinion, to combat this threat, a collective intellectual effort is required - and after all, it's exactly this kind of effort that makes the blogosphere powerful. So the challenge is to be aware of, and honest about the extent of the threat - while keeping your sanity. Which for me was hard enough before 9/11. Nonetheless, despite my fear of subway terrorism that I feel every day, I also celebrate every day - I celebrate being alive, being able to see the sun, and do all kinds of things.
Unlike the Cold War, when there was very little an ordinary citizen could do about it, this jihad war is all about what ordinary citizens do. Will we turn into beasts while fighting beasts? Will we let them enslave us? Will we keep our freedoms and our dignity? Perhaps the answers will vary from person to person, but I'm afraid there is a chance we will lose. Maybe not lose our lives, but lose freedom of speech, and the safety and prosperity that Americans have built for themselves - hell, we've already lost some of that. So the question is, how can we keep and defend all that? There is no easy solution, which is why complacency is not an option, despite all the neurosis that's caused by thinking about this "war" thing.
It is simply inconceivable that the Islamists will defeat us militarily, let alone impose their culture on us.
My comment:
Militarily - yes, but imposing their culture on us - goodness, they've already done it. Danish cartoons is just the beginning, along with European politicians hugging Hamas, along with Khatami being a guest of honor at Harvard and National Cathedral.
Those who help them destroy our culture have been doing it since the 60s in our universities and media. If (or when, rather) we have more 9/11-type attacks, who will want to live in New York, LA and Chicago? And what then will happen to our economic might?
...
I understand Glenn being tired of all the bloggers saying we're doomed. I'm tired of that, too. I'm also tired of being afraid that the subway car I'm riding in will blow up. The most natural reaction is to go back to business as usual, as James Lileks put it:
The good news? We returned to our norm: cheerful industrious self-directed Americans who think in terms of fiscal quarters, not ancient grievances, and trust in Coke and Mickey to spread our message of tolerance and prosperity. The bad news? Same as the good. Or perhaps it’s the other way around.
To make yourself feel better, you sometimes have to stop thinking about this threat, and politics in general. But in my opinion, to combat this threat, a collective intellectual effort is required - and after all, it's exactly this kind of effort that makes the blogosphere powerful. So the challenge is to be aware of, and honest about the extent of the threat - while keeping your sanity. Which for me was hard enough before 9/11. Nonetheless, despite my fear of subway terrorism that I feel every day, I also celebrate every day - I celebrate being alive, being able to see the sun, and do all kinds of things.
Unlike the Cold War, when there was very little an ordinary citizen could do about it, this jihad war is all about what ordinary citizens do. Will we turn into beasts while fighting beasts? Will we let them enslave us? Will we keep our freedoms and our dignity? Perhaps the answers will vary from person to person, but I'm afraid there is a chance we will lose. Maybe not lose our lives, but lose freedom of speech, and the safety and prosperity that Americans have built for themselves - hell, we've already lost some of that. So the question is, how can we keep and defend all that? There is no easy solution, which is why complacency is not an option, despite all the neurosis that's caused by thinking about this "war" thing.
11 верасня 2006
Russian "philosopher": 9/11 inspired anti-american movement
In this post, an America-hating blogger from Russia says that the events of 9/11 inspired the anti-American movement for times to come. The most important conclusion from 9/11, he says, is that America is vulnerable, it can actually be blown up.
Then he goes on a rant about how he wouldn't mind doing it himself. While the idiot is pathetic in his impotent hatred, I actually agree with his points: America is vulnerable, and 9/11 did inspire a lot of anti-Americanism, both here and abroad.
Then he goes on a rant about how he wouldn't mind doing it himself. While the idiot is pathetic in his impotent hatred, I actually agree with his points: America is vulnerable, and 9/11 did inspire a lot of anti-Americanism, both here and abroad.
07 верасня 2006
More on Disagreement
“Do we listen to those that we disagree with, and vigorously challenge them, or do we close our ears completely?" -
says the Dean of Harvard, justifying the desicion to invite an Iranian mullah to speak at Harvard. via LGF
It's not so much that I disagree with the mullahs. It's that they want me dead.
Which part of "Death to America" don't they understand at Harvard? Or at the State Department for that matter.
says the Dean of Harvard, justifying the desicion to invite an Iranian mullah to speak at Harvard. via LGF
It's not so much that I disagree with the mullahs. It's that they want me dead.
Which part of "Death to America" don't they understand at Harvard? Or at the State Department for that matter.
Steyn is hilarious
... in his article about the Australian PM. Right on target, too.
Why would gazillions of American radio listeners appreciate a line from Howard? Because he says things that none of their own leaders ever quite say. Last week it was the stuff about Muslim immigrants needing to learn English and making sure they're cool with this equal-rights-for-women business. The soi-disant arrogant Texas cowboy rarely shoots from the lip like that. Instead, he says things such as: "Freedom is the desire of every human heart."
Look, I'm a supporter of the Bush doctrine to spread liberty throughout the Muslim world, but I support it on hard-headed grounds of national security. You only have to watch a couple of minutes of the lads in Gaza and southern Lebanon on the telly every night to realise freedom comes pretty low down on the list of their hearts' desires.
Go read it. I think Bush's approval ratings at home would be higher if he dropped the "every human heart" kind of talk about freedom: it makes him sound idealistic. It makes him sound like he's on a quest to spread freedon, whereas he needs to be on a quest to defend America. Democracy in the ME is a means to an end, and the Bush Administration doesn't seem to be clear on that.
The State Department's keeps trying to appease our enemies, letting Iranian mullahs into the country. Bush's "compassionate" stand on borders and immigration doesn't make it look like he understand how serious the threat is.
Why would gazillions of American radio listeners appreciate a line from Howard? Because he says things that none of their own leaders ever quite say. Last week it was the stuff about Muslim immigrants needing to learn English and making sure they're cool with this equal-rights-for-women business. The soi-disant arrogant Texas cowboy rarely shoots from the lip like that. Instead, he says things such as: "Freedom is the desire of every human heart."
Look, I'm a supporter of the Bush doctrine to spread liberty throughout the Muslim world, but I support it on hard-headed grounds of national security. You only have to watch a couple of minutes of the lads in Gaza and southern Lebanon on the telly every night to realise freedom comes pretty low down on the list of their hearts' desires.
Go read it. I think Bush's approval ratings at home would be higher if he dropped the "every human heart" kind of talk about freedom: it makes him sound idealistic. It makes him sound like he's on a quest to spread freedon, whereas he needs to be on a quest to defend America. Democracy in the ME is a means to an end, and the Bush Administration doesn't seem to be clear on that.
The State Department's keeps trying to appease our enemies, letting Iranian mullahs into the country. Bush's "compassionate" stand on borders and immigration doesn't make it look like he understand how serious the threat is.
06 верасня 2006
R.I.P. Julia
Our comrade died, I found out today. It's sad news, and I find it hard to believe, remembering how full of life and energy Julia was. May she rest in peace.
Expropriation and Confiscation
I am mentioned in Weekly Standard.
The last time Clements came here in vain, he made the trip worth his while by confronting Mayor Brian Wahler at a street fair with a camera and a Vladimir Lenin impersonator. Clements and Lenin tried to present Wahler with the "People's Award for Expropriation and Confiscation." The award was an old cheerleading trophy, the cheerleader's megaphone replaced with a hammer and sickle. Wahler wasn't in the mood to accept, telling them, "I'm going to give you exactly two minutes to get out of here."
When Wahler put a hand on him, Clements snapped, "Don't put your arm around me. You're not my friend. You're an enemy of property rights, you're an enemy of the Constitution, and you're a little dictator. And you're taking the Halpers' land. So we're going to be here all day. Lenin, you like cotton candy don't you?" Lenin never got his cotton candy. The Piscataway dictator's police force soon chased them off.
Read it all!
The last time Clements came here in vain, he made the trip worth his while by confronting Mayor Brian Wahler at a street fair with a camera and a Vladimir Lenin impersonator. Clements and Lenin tried to present Wahler with the "People's Award for Expropriation and Confiscation." The award was an old cheerleading trophy, the cheerleader's megaphone replaced with a hammer and sickle. Wahler wasn't in the mood to accept, telling them, "I'm going to give you exactly two minutes to get out of here."
When Wahler put a hand on him, Clements snapped, "Don't put your arm around me. You're not my friend. You're an enemy of property rights, you're an enemy of the Constitution, and you're a little dictator. And you're taking the Halpers' land. So we're going to be here all day. Lenin, you like cotton candy don't you?" Lenin never got his cotton candy. The Piscataway dictator's police force soon chased them off.
Read it all!
05 верасня 2006
No Public Transportation For You Today!
...in the town of Luban in Belarus.
agafon_bel reports:
All the buses are beimg used to transport citizens to rural areas so they can perform the infamous agricultural labor
They did it to us from the 7th grade on - back in the good old Soviet days. For Belarusians, the good old days are still on. Lenin is always alive! Long lives the Soviet Union!
Doesn't it?
agafon_bel reports:
All the buses are beimg used to transport citizens to rural areas so they can perform the infamous agricultural labor
They did it to us from the 7th grade on - back in the good old Soviet days. For Belarusians, the good old days are still on. Lenin is always alive! Long lives the Soviet Union!
Doesn't it?
02 верасня 2006
Misunderstanding and Disagreement
Oh, that was just a misunderstanding. I was like 14, and I was wit' ma man, and we was having words--like, we was having a disagreement--and I stabbed him, is all. It was just a misunderstanding.
via the fabulous oiny
via the fabulous oiny